|
Research and Application for
Funding
|
CONSORTIUM
ACTIVITIES COMPLETED
COOPERATIVELY BY MEMBERS
Full listing (8/2009) |
New Resource for Cultural Competence Education in
PT
Authored by
Karen Panzarella PT,
PhD, and Mary Matteliano MS, OTR/L,
State University of New York at Buffalo
Full
article
Professional Development Needs of CIs
Presented at World PT Conference. Oct. 2007
Full article
Professional Development
Needs of CI's
Presented at World PT Conference. Oct. 2007
Full article
Professional DPT Students'
Perspectives on the Use of An Integrated Standardized Patient
Examination.
Platform Presentation at ELC. Oct. 2008
Full article
Clinical Instructors
Perspectives on the Rights and Priveleges Offered by Academic
Programs and Workplaces.
Poster Presentation at Combined Sections. Feb. 2008
Full article
Clinical Instructors'
Self-Perception of Competence in Teaching
Core Content Areas of Curriculum to Professional DPT Students:
Implications for Academic Programs, Journal of Physical Therapy
Education
2008; 22(2): 51-59
Recker-Hughes C, Pivko S, Mowder JJ, Brooks G.
Link to article
"A testimonial from a
Clinical Instructor turned Director of Clinical Education about
student mentoring"
Link to
article
Self-Reported Characteristics of
Physical Therapy Clinical Instructors: A Comparison to the American Physical
Therapy Association's Guidelines and
Self-Assessments for Clinical Education
Kathleen M. Buccieri, PT, MS, PCS
Kathleen Schultze, PT, MS, CHT
Jill Dungey, PT, MS, GCS
Theresa A. Kolodziej, PT, DPT, MS
Shauna Malta, PT, MS
Samantha Marooco, PT, MS. GCS
Janice Michaels PT, DPT
Renee Stolove, PT, MA, MPH
Abstract:
Background and Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine, by
self-report, the professional development and educational activities engaged
in by physical therapists (PTs) who choose to be clinical instructors (CIs)
in physical therapist education programs. The research sought to describe
the characteristics of CIs, correlate the characteristics to selected
guidelines for CIs from the American Physical therapy Association's
Guidelines and Self-Assessments for Clinical Education, and determine
relationships between characteristics of CIs and self-report of
effectiveness and competence as supervisors of physical therapists students.
Subjects: The investigators, participating academic members of the
New York New Jersey Physical Therapy Clinical Education Consortium, randomly
selected 349 clinical sites affiliated with the physical therapist education
programs. From this sample of convenience, all CIs indentified on the
Clinical Site Information Forms of selected clinical affiliates were
selected as subjects.
Methods: Investigators-designed questionnaires tested for content and
face validity were mailed to 1,812 CIs listed on the Clinical Site
Information Forms by the Center Coordinators of Clinical Education at the
349 selected sites.
Results: Of the total surveys mailed, 621 surveys were returned, for
a response rate of 33%. CIs were primarily female, had obtained professional
(entry-level) Bachelor of Science or Master of Science degrees, had been
practicing physical therapy for 2 or more years, has participated in
continuing education courses, and had supervised between 1-4 students per
year. CIs reported that they were effectively prepared to be CIs and felt
competent in this role. Positive relationships existed between self-report
of effectiveness and the respondent's age, years in physical therapy
practice, years as a CI, total number of students supervised, credentialing
as a CI, and the use of the Guide to Physical Therapy Practice.
Discussion and Conclusions: The outcomes of this study could
provide information to academic and clinical communities for program
development and training activities to enhance PT clinical education.
The Consortium is very proud of our members who have recently
published an article in the Spring issue (2004) of The Journal of Physical Therapy
Education. Please review the abstract below.
Article Title:
Clinical
Performance Expectations: A Preliminary Study Comparing Physical Therapy
Students, Clinical Instructors and Academic Faculty
Martha Macht Sliwinski PT, PhD - Hunter College
Kathleen Schultze PT MS, CHT - The Sage Colleges
Ruth Lyons Hansen PT, MS, CCS - Mercy College
Shauna Malta PT, MS - Utica College
Suzanne R. Babyar, PT, PhD - Hunter College
Abstract:
Background and Purpose: The Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) was developed by
the American Physical Therapy Association in 1997 to evaluate physical therapy (PT)
students performance during clinical education. The purpose of this study was to
determine differences in expectations of academic PT faculty, clinical PT faculty
and PT students regarding CPI performance ratings at the conclusion of the first full-time
clinical education experience.
Subjects: Academic Coordinators of Clinical
Education from nine PT education programs who were members of the New York/New
Jersey PT Clinical Education Consortium (CEC) participated in the study 197 Students and
28 academic faculty (AF) from each of these programs responded. Clinical Instructors (CIs)
were mailed surveys using the CEC mailing list with a response rate of 18%.
Methods: Respondents used a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) to indicate the
expected final scores for students on the 24 CPI items. Linear measurements (mm) from the
left anchor of the VAS were the dependent measures. One-way analysis of variance used to
compare means among students, AF and CIs.
Results: Students, AF and CIs, did not expect entry-level competency on any CPI
item. AF and CI demonstrated no significant differences on any of the 24 performance
criteria. Twelve items showed no significant differences among the groups. Student
expectation levels were significantly higher than the AF and CIs on 12 and 5 items
respectively.
Discussion and Conclusions: AF and CIs agree about expected performance of
students during their first full-time clinical experience. Students had higher
expectations than AF and CIs on several items which may reflect students perceptions
of confidence in more advanced skills. A larger sample from a wider geographic area is
needed in future studies of the CPI.
A Model for Integrated Assessment of
Clinical Competence
Karen J. Panzarella, PT, PhD
Andrea T. Manyon, MD
Abstract:
An interdisciplinary group of faculty from medicine,
basic sciences, physical therapy, and education developed a
performance assessment tool for evaluating clinical competence. This
group was assembled following the revision to integrated
systems-based curricula in the school of medicine and doctor of
physical therapy program. The group was challenged to measure
curricular outcomes through student assessment of clinical
competence as defined through integration. The Integrated
Standardized Patient Examination was developed as the assessment
tool. This model utilizes standardized patients, who are trained to
ask questions that require the students to integrate scientific
knowledge and communicate this back to the patient. The student
response is graded on a rubric and averaged with a history-taking
portion of the examination. This model was administered to 140
first-year medical students who were randomly assigned to either an
acute low back pain case or gastroesophageal reflux disease case.
Clinical faculty scored the students in the treatment room, with
additional faculty scoring in the monitor room. Interrater agreement
was 87% for the low back pain case and 82% for the gastroesophageal
reflux disease case. These results warrant further investigation of
the Integrated Standardized Patient Examination for transfer to
other health care professions, in particular physical therapy.
More...
Using the Integrated Standardized Patient
Examination
to Assess Clinical Competence in
Physical Therapist Students
Karen J. Panzarella, PT, PhD
Andrea T. Manyon, MD
Background and Purpose:
To test the success of integrated curricula and “clinical
readiness” of students in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs,
meaningful measurements of student competence are necessary.
Competence testing must include an authentic clinical encounter.
Standardized patients (SP) have long shown to be reliable teaching
and assessment tools in health professional education and should be
explored with DPT students.
More...
|